UPDATE and DEADLINE EXTENSION: 2nd Public Consultation on Draft EPEAT Criteria on Sustainable Use of Resources (aka “Circularity”)
This special announcement is to alert stakeholders to a document revision and deadline extension for the 2nd public consultation on the Draft Criteria on Sustainable Use of Resources for the EPEAT ecolabel.
Minor errors were identified in the clean and redline draft criteria documents posted last week. The errors, outlined below, have been corrected and updated versions of the clean and redline draft criteria documents have been posted HERE. Note that if using the original link to the public consultation webpage, you will be redirected to the updated webpage.
Since the documents were modified, the second public consultation will be extended a week, closing March 10, 2024 at 11:59pm.
For public commenters, the 2nd consultation is limited in scope to those revisions proposed by the Technical Committee since the initial public consultation. The public consultation process is managed by NSF International, on behalf of GEC. All public comments must be submitted through the NSF comment platform, which provides detailed instructions on comment submittal.
The following errors were corrected in the redline draft criteria document. Item 1 was also corrected in the clean draft criteria document, provided HERE for reference.
1) Criterion 5.1.3 and 5.1.4. The following sentences preceding Tables 5.1.3 & 5.1.4, respectively, were removed as the Technical Committee chose to include thresholds in the Table.
Product > 500 kg shall contain at a minimum 250 grams post-consumer recycled plastic content (by weight).
Product > 500 kg shall contain a minimum recycled and biobased plastic content (by weight) of 500 grams for 1 point and 1000 grams for 2 points.
2) Criterion 5.1.4, the following sentence is now shown in redline as the Technical Committee removed the text. It was redundant.
Point value: 1, 2 or 3 points (maximum of 3 points)
3) Criterion 5.6.2 is now shown in full strikeout as it was not approved by the Technical Committee. An explanation is provided in the comment box.
4) The Optional Points in Annex A, Criterion 5.1.4, were changed from 1-2 to 1-3 points to reflect modifications in the criterion.
Please contact Cassandra Leone at NSF (cleone@nsf.org) for assistance with comment submittal, if needed.
General questions regarding EPEAT criteria should be directed to Criteria@globalelectronicscouncil.org.